Antimicrobial potential of child mouthwashes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47990/alop.v12i1.390

Keywords:

bacteria; mouthwashes; Streptococcus mutans, child, in vitro techniques

Abstract

Purpose: Little is known about the antimicrobial potential of mouthwashes in Streptococcus mutans bacteria. The objective of this in vitro study was to investigate the antimicrobial effects of infant mouthwashes against those bacteria. Materials and Methods: S. mutans strain was used to perform inhibition zones by agar diffusion test. Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar dishes were divided in quadrants: G1 – cetylperidinium chloride (Cepacol Teen®); G2 – xylitol and triclosan (Dentalclean Garfield®); G3 – Malva sylvestris, xylitol (Malvatrikids Jr®) and G4 - phosphate buffer saline (PBS). After adjustment of bacteria, an aliquot of each group was plated on the BHI agar and transferred to an atmosphere at 37ºC for 48 hours to perform the inhibition zones measurements. The data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA for intergroup comparison (α = 0.05). Results: Inhibition zones were verified only to G1 (10.82 ± 2.13) and G3 (12.75 ± 1.04). No significant statistical difference was verified between G1 and G3 (p = 0.287) and G2 and G4 (p ≥ 0.05). Conclusion: Despite of the beneficial effects of mouthwashes, a combination of xylitol and triclosan was not effective to control S. mutans growth in this in vitro condition. Additional restrictions to regulate the antimicrobial substances selling and further clarification should be provided to population.

References

Sanz M, Beighton D, Curtis MA, et al. Role of microbial biofilms in the maintenance of oral health and in the development of dental caries and periodontal diseases. Consensus report of group 1 of the Joint EFP/ORCA workshop on the boundaries between caries and periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44 Suppl 18:S5-S11.

Latimer J, Munday JL, Buzza KM, Forbes S, Sreenivasan PK, McBain AJ. Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity of mouthrinses containing cetylpyridinium chloride and sodium fluoride. BMC Microbiol. 2015; 15:169.

Takenaka S, Ohsumi T, Noiri Y. Evidence-based strategy for dental biofilms: Current evidence of mouthwashes on dental biofilm and gingivitis. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2019;55(1):33-40.

Yang SJ, Han SH, Lee AR, et al. Evaluation of antimicrobial effects of commercial mouthwashes utilized in South Korea. BMB Rep. 2015;48(1):42-47.

Abu-Obaid E, Salama F, Abu-Obaid A, Alanazi F, Salem M, Auda S. Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effects of Different Mouthrinses against Streptococcus Mutans: An in Vitro Study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019;43(6):398-407.

Sampaio GG, Leódido G, Gonçalves LM, Paschoal MA. In vitro antimicrobial potential of infant mouthwashes against streptococcus mutans biofilm: A preliminary study. Indian J Dent Res. 2019;30(3):399-402.

James P, Worthington HV, Parnell C, et al. Chlorhexidine mouthrinse as an adjunctive treatment for gingival health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3(3):CD008676.

Walsh T, Oliveira-Neto JM, Moore D. Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(4):CD008457.

Marsh PD. Microbiology of dental plaque biofilms and their role in oral health and caries. Dent Clin North Am. 2010;54(3):441-454.

Williams MI. The antibacterial and antiplaque effectiveness of mouthwashes containing cetylpyridinium chloride with and without alcohol in improving gingival health. J Clin Dent. 2011;22(6):179-182.

Gunsolley JC. Clinical efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinses. J Dent. 2010;38 Suppl 1: S6-S10.

Malhotra R, Grover V, Kapoor A, Saxena D. Comparison of the effectiveness of a commercially available herbal mouthrinse with chlorhexidine gluconate at the clinical and patient level. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2011;15(4):349-352.

Nagappan N, John J. Antimicrobial efficacy of herbal and CHX mouth rinse – A systematic review. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2012; 2:5-10.

Ciancio SG. Mouthwashes: Rationale for use. Am J Dent. 2015;28 Spec No A:4A-8A.

NCCLS (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards). (2003). Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard, 6th edition. M7-A6. NCCLS, Wayne, PA.

Paschoal MA, Lin M, Santos-Pinto L, Duarte S. Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy on Streptococcus mutans using curcumin and toluidine blue activated by a novel LED device. Lasers Med Sci. 2015; 30:888-890.

Fernandez Y Mostajo M, Exterkate RAM, Buijs MJ, Crielaard W, Zaura E. Effect of mouthwashes on the composition and metabolic activity of oral biofilms grown in vitro. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(4):1221-1230.

Evans A, Leishman SJ, Walsh LJ, Seow WK. Inhibitory effects of antiseptic mouthrinses on Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Aust Dent J. 2015;60(2):247-270.

Subramaniam P, Nandan N. Effect of xylitol, sodium fluoride and triclosan containing mouth rinse on Streptococcus mutans. Contemp Clin Dent. 2011;2(4):287-290.

Prasanth M. Antimicrobial efficacy of different toothpastes and mouthrinses: an in vitro study. Dent Res J. 2011;8(2):85-94.

Almerich JM, Cabedo B, Ortolá JC, Poblet J. Influence of alcohol in mouthwashes containing triclosan and zinc: an experimental gingivitis study. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(6):539-544.

Lulic M, Leiggener Görög I, Salvi GE, Ramseier CA, Mattheos N, Lang NP. One-year outcomes of repeated adjunctive photodynamic therapy during periodontal maintenance: a proof-of-principle randomized-controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(8):661-666.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-27

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

Antimicrobial potential of child mouthwashes. (2022). Latin American Pediatric Dentistry Journal, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.47990/alop.v12i1.390