Environmental risk factors associated with orofacial malformations and neural tube defects in newborns
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47990/0zb11y77Keywords:
congenital abnormalities, cleft lip, cleft palate, neural tube defects, risk factorsAbstract
Introduction: Orofacial malformations and neural tube defects, such as cleft lip, cleft palate, and myelomeningocele, affect the health and quality of life of newborns. Their origin is multifactorial, and their presence increases the risk of complications and infant mortality. Objective: To determine the frequency of risk factors associated with orofacial malformations and neural tube defects in newborns. Materials and Methods: The records of newborns diagnosed with congenital and orofacial malformations registered from January 2018 to June 2022 at the Hospital de la Mujer Zacatecana were reviewed. Likewise, the statistical association between these diagnoses and the identified risk factors was evaluated. Results: 33.67% presented orofacial malformations, isolated or associated with syndromes and neural tube defects. Within this group, 34.8% corresponded to cases of cleft lip, both unilateral and bilateral; 36.4% also had cleft palate. Of the neural tube defects and other embryological structures, 25 cases were presented: 48% were myelomeningocele, 16% were mandibular defects, and 12% were hemifacial microsomia. A statistically significant association was observed between neural tube defects and other embryological structures, as well as the presence of urinary tract infections during pregnancy, in individuals with insufficient folate intake (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The complexity of addressing congenital malformations and implementing multidisciplinary strategies for prevention, early detection, and comprehensive management of associated risk factors is highlighted.
References
1. Zambrano M, Hernández E. Prevención de Defectos Congénitos en Atención Primaria de Salud. Ateneo. 2022; 24(1):123-148.
2. Solorio-Fosado J, Martínez-Martínez J, Peñuelas-Romero J, Ibarra-Chaidez J, Chávez-Mondragón E, Arenas-Sordo M. Malformaciones del primero y segundo arcos branquiales. Conceptos embriológicos y genéticos y pautas de seguimiento de los pacientes. An Orl Mex. 2023; 68(3):107-138.
3. Magreni A, May J.G. Embryology of the oral structures. Oper Tech Otolayngol Head Neck Surg. 2015; 26(3):110-114.
4. Muñoz M, Kilchemmann C, Román A, Baeza B. Prevalencia de malformaciones congénitas en recién nacidos de la región de la Araucanía. Andes pediatr. 2022;93(3):383-391.
5. Ni W, Tian T, Zhang L, Li Z, Wang L, Ren A. Maternal periconceptional consumption of sprouted potato and risks of neural tube defects and orofacial clefts. Nutr J. 2018;17:112.
6. Lema RA, Godoy MJ, Rodríguez R, Martínez JE, Jadán AM. Aproximación integradora a la etiología genética de labio y paladar hendido. Archivos Venezolanos de Farmacología y Terapéutica. 2019;38(2): 93-100.
7. Ostia-Garza P, Luna-Ríos E, Plaza-Benhumea L. Exencefalia: diagnóstico prenatal y reporte de caso. Perinatol. Reprod. Hum. 2022;36(1): 25-29.
8. Santiago-Sanabria L, Morales-Martínez O, Alonso-León M, Sanabria-Villegas L, Sánchez-Alquicira B, Ignacio-García M. Defecto del tubo neural: encefalocele occipital. Reporte de caso. Rev Fac Med UNAM. 2024;67(5):29-36.
9. Navarrete-HE, Cnún-S S, Reyes-PA, Sierra-RM, Valdés-H J. Prevalencia de malformaciones congénitas registradas en el certificado de nacimiento y de muerte fetal en México. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 2013;70(6):499-505.
10. González A, Luna F, Sotelo MS, Hernández M, Díaz C. Estudio retrospectivo de la prevalencia de labio y paladar hendido en el Hospital de la Mujer Zacatecana de 2013 a 2015. Revista Latinoamericana de Ortodoncia y Odontopediatría. 2020;42.
11. Tsehay B, Shitie D, Lake A, Abebaw E, Taye A, Essa E. Determinants and seasonality of major structural birth defects among newborns delivered at primary and referral hospital of East and West Gojjam zones, Northwest Ethiopia 2017–2018: case–control study. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):495.
12. Escoffié-RM. Asociación de labio y/o paladar hendido con variables de posición socioeconómica: un estudio de casos y controles. Rev Bras Saúde Matern Infant. 2010;10(3):323–9.
13. Mendonca J. Maternal Folic Acid Intake and Risk of Nonsyndromic Orofacial Clefts: A Hospital-Based CaseControl Study in Bangalore, India. The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal. 2020;57(6):678–686.
14. Martelli DR, Coletta RD, Oliveira EA, Serts MS, Rodrigues LA, Oliveira MC, Martelli Júnior H. Association between maternal smoking, gender, and cleft lip and palate. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 2015;81(5):514-519.
15. Hoyt T, Canfield A, Romitti A, Botto D, Anderka T, Krikov V, et.al. Associations between maternal periconceptional exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke and major birth defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(5):613.e1-613.e11.
16. Howley M, Feldkamp M, Papadopoulos E, Fisher S, Arnold K, Browne M, et.al. National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Maternal genitourinary infections and risk of birth defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Birth defects Res. 2018;110(19):1443–1454. 17. García M, García M, Jiménez L, Armada Z. Padrón, R, Chala, JM. Factores maternos y el consumo de medicamentos durante el embarazo asociados a la aparición de alteraciones neonatales. Acta Médica del Centro. 2023;17(1):145-153.
18. Álvarez Y, Lantigua P, Benítez Y, Pérez O, Collazo E. Defectos congénitos presentes en la descendencia de mujeres diabéticas, obesas e hipertensas, Artemisa 2016. Revista Cubana de Genética Comunitaria. 2021;13(1):e92.
19. Torres O, Hernández I, Meneses C, Ruvalcaba J. Infección urinaria como factor de riesgo para parto pretérmino. JONNPR. 2020;5(11):1426-1443.
20. López OP. Infección de vías urinarias en mujeres gestantes. Revista Médica Sinergia. 2021;6(12):e745.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Latin American Pediatric Dentistry Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.















